Bariatric endoscopy, care-curative medicine and legal conflicts. Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group (Gettemo-SEED) Positioning.

Bariatric endoscopy treats obesity as a disease, in addition to its multiple associated comorbidities, so it should be considered in the "care-curative" field and not as "satisfying, voluntary or outcoming" medicine. Insufficient weight loss cases, or complications may occur. This, in parallel with the greater diffusion of these techniques, results an increase in the risk of complaints and judicial claims, which will presumably grow during next years. In this sense, we consider that all Bariatric Endoscopic Units working with medical-scientific rigor, must be able to be accredited and have legal support by the Scientific Societies. We propose to create a Medical-Legal Advisory Committee, composed of a medical team and a specialized law firm, which allows advising and guiding the endoscopist when incurring in a conflict.

Spanish Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (SIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 20 000 cases.

BACKGROUND: intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a minimally invasive, increasingly popular option for obesity treatment. However, there is only one worldwide guideline standardizing the technical aspects of the procedure (BIBC, SOARD 2018). OBJECTIVES: to construct a practical guideline for IGB usage by reproducing and expanding the BIBC survey among the Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group (GETTEMO). METHODS: a 140-question survey was submitted to all GETTEMO members. Twenty-one Spanish experienced endoscopists in IGBs answered back. Eight topics on patient selection, indications/contraindications, technique, multidisciplinary follow-up, results, safety, and financial/legal aspects were discussed. Consensus was defined as consensus ≥ 70 %. RESULTS: overall data included 20 680 IGBs including 12 different models. Mean age was 42.0 years-old, 79.9 % were women, and the mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 34.05 kg/m². Indication in BMI > 25 kg/m², 10 absolute contraindications, and nutritional and medication measures at follow-up were settled. A mean %TBWL (total body weight loss) of 17.66 % ± 2.5 % was observed. Early removal rate due to intolerance was 3.62 %. Adverse event rate was 0.70 % and 6.37 % for major and minor complications with consensual management. A single case of mortality occurred. IGBs were placed in private health, prior contract, and with full and single payment at the beginning. Seven lawsuits (0.034 %) were received, all ran through civil proceeding, and with favorable final resolution. CONCLUSIONS: this consensus based on more than 20 000 cases represents practical recommendations to perform IGB procedures. This experience shows that the device leads to satisfactory weight loss with a low rate of adverse events. Most results are reproducible compared to those obtained by the BIBC.

Spanish Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (SIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 20 000 cases

Background: intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a minimally invasive, increasingly popular option for obesity treatment. However, there is only one worldwide guideline standardizing the technical aspects of the procedure (BIBC, SOARD 2018). Objectives: to construct a practical guideline for IGB usage by reproducing and expanding the BIBC survey among the Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group (GETTEMO). Methods: a 140-question survey was submitted to all GETTEMO members. Twenty-one Spanish experienced endoscopists in IGBs answered back. Eight topics on patient selection, indications/contraindications, technique, multidisciplinary follow-up, results, safety, and financial/legal aspects were discussed. Consensus was defined as consensus ≥ 70 %. Results: overall data included 20 680 IGBs including 12 different models. Mean age was 42.0 years-old, 79.9 % were women, and the mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 34.05 kg/m². Indication in BMI > 25 kg/m², 10 absolute contraindications, and nutritional and medication measures at follow-up were settled. A mean %TBWL (total body weight loss) of 17.66 % ± 2.5 % was observed. Early removal rate due to intolerance was 3.62 %. Adverse event rate was 0.70 % and 6.37 % for major and minor complications with consensual management. A single case of mortality occurred. IGBs were placed in private health, prior contract, and with full and single payment at the beginning. Seven lawsuits (0.034 %) were received, all ran through civil proceeding, and with favorable final resolution. Conclusions: this consensus based on more than 20 000 cases represents practical recommendations to perform IGB procedures. This experience shows that the device leads to satisfactory weight loss with a low rate of adverse events. Most results are reproducible compared to those obtained by the BIBC (AU)

Eating habits, lifestyle behaviors and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic quarantine among Peruvian adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has led to an unprecedented public health crisis. In Peru, although the quarantine is no longer mandatory, it was during the first months of 2020. To date, no studies have assessed the impact of the COVID-19 on the eating patterns and lifestyle context in the country. We aimed to describe the eating habits, lifestyle behaviors and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic quarantine among Peruvian adults. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study. We used an online survey to collect information regarding eating habits, self-perceived stress and sedentary lifestyle among adults over 18 years of age residing in Lima-Peru and who complied with strict home quarantine. We presented our data according to the weight variation of the participants. RESULTS: A total of 686 were finally included in the study. The 82.9% were female, the median BMI was 25.97 kg/m2 (IQR: 23.37-29.41) and 68.2% reported a significant variation in their weight (38.9% increased and 29.3% lost weight). All bad habits were significantly associated with weight gain, except for prolonged fasting. Additionally, a sitting time longer than usual (p = 0.001), being in front of a screen for more than five hours in the last week (p = 0.002), and most of the stressful scenarios were significantly associated with weight gain. CONCLUSION: Almost four out of ten participants gained weight during the quarantine. This was associated with unhealthy eating habits, physical inactivity, and stressful scenarios.

Principales medidas de profilaxis en endoscopia bariátrica. Guía Española de Recomendación de Expertos / No disponible

No disponible

Main prophylactic measures in bariatric endoscopy. Spanish Expert Recommendations Guideline.

Bariatric endoscopy (BE) encompasses a number of techniques -some consolidated, some under development- aiming to contribute to the management of obese patients and their associated metabolic diseases as a complement to dietary and lifestyle changes. To date different intragastric balloon models, suture systems, aspiration methods, substance injections and both gastric and duodenal malabsorptive devices have been developed, as well as endoscopic procedures for the revision of bariatric surgery. Their ongoing evolution conditions a gradual increase in the quantity and quality of scientific evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Despite this, scientific evidence remains inadequate to establish strong grades of recommendation allowing a unified perspective on prophylaxis in BE. This dearth of data conditions leads, in daily practice, to frequently extrapolate the measures that are used in bariatric surgery (BS) and/or in general therapeutic endoscopy. In this respect, this special article is intended to reach a consensus on the most common prophylactic measures we should apply in BE. The methodological design of this document was developed while attempting to comply with the following 5 phases: Phase 1: delimitation and scope of objectives, according to the GRADE Clinical Guidelines. Phase 2: setup of the Clinical Guide-developing Group: national experts, members of the Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica (GETTEMO, SEED), SEPD, and SECO, selecting 2 authors for each section. Phase 3: clinical question form (PICO): patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes. Phase 4: literature assessment and synthesis. Search for evidence and elaboration of recommendations. Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification, most evidence in this article will correspond to level 5 (expert opinions without explicit critical appraisal) and grade of recommendation C (favorable yet inconclusive recommendation) or D (inconclusive or inconsistent studies). Phase 5: External review by experts. We hope that these basic preventive measures will be of interest for daily practice, and may help prevent medical and/or legal conflicts for the benefit of patients, physicians, and BE in general.

Balón intragástrico ingerible Elipse(R). Viabilidad, resultados y requerimientos endoscópicos. Experiencia inicial / Feasibility, results and endoscopic requirements of the Elipse(R) swallowable intragastric balloon: initial experience

Antecedentes: el balón intragástrico Elipse(R) consiste en una cápsula ingerible que se rellena bajo control radiológico. Pasadas 16 semanas, su válvula se degrada, el balón se vacía y se elimina por vía natural, sin endoscopia. El objetivo del estudio es valorar su viabilidad, eficacia, duración, seguridad y requerimientos endoscópicos. Métodos: estudio prospectivo y descriptivo, no aleatorizado, de los primeros pacientes remitidos para Elipse(R). Tras colocación, se realizaba sistemáticamente una radiografía para confirmar su correcto rellenado. Se determinaba la duración del balón en función de su visualización excretado o por radiografía/ecografía. Se recogieron datos de eficacia, tolerancia, efectos adversos y su resolución (requerimientos endoscópicos), así como el grado final de satisfacción a las 16 semanas. Resultados: participaron en el estudio 30 pacientes con peso e índice de masa corporal (IMC) medios basales de 83,3 +/- 10,7 kg y 30,6 +/- 2,7 kg/m². Todos pudieron ingerir la cápsula con correcto control radiológico. A los cuatro meses presentaban una pérdida media de 11,2 +/- 5,5 kg (12,1 +/- 5,8% de pérdida total de peso [PTP], 64,7 +/- 25% de pérdida del exceso de peso [PEP]), con pérdida de peso > 10% en el 80% de pacientes (p < 0,05). Obtuvimos una eliminación precoz del balón con duración insuficiente (< 12 semanas) en 2/24 pacientes (8,3%). La tolerancia fue aceptable en el 80%. Efectos adversos: un vómito del balón, una intolerancia (extracción por gastroscopia) y una oclusión ileal (extracción por ileoscopia). El grado final de satisfacción fue bueno en el 60%. Conclusiones: la implantación del balón Elipse(R) mediante radiología parece viable y segura. A pesar de que algunos balones presentan una duración inferior a la estimable (< 16 semanas en el 29%, incluyendo < 12 semanas en el 8,3%), se obtuvo una aceptable pérdida de peso a los cuatro meses. Existen efectos adversos que requieren endoscopia, por lo que aconsejamos que sea supervisado por un endoscopista bariátrico

Background: the Elipse(R) intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a swallowable capsule that is filled under x-ray control. After 16 weeks, its self-releasing valve is degraded and the balloon is deflated and excreted naturally, without endoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of EIGB and its efficacy, duration, safety and endoscopic requirements. Methods: this is a prospective, descriptive, non-randomized study of the first patients enrolled for EIGB. An x-ray was systematically performed after placement to ensure the correct filling of the balloon. The balloon duration was determined according to its excreted visualization or by x-ray/ultrasound. The efficacy, tolerance, adverse events and their resolution outcome (endoscopic requirements), as well as the final satisfaction degree at 16 weeks, were analyzed. Results: the study included 30 patients with a basal mean weight and body mass index (BMI) of 83.3 +/- 10.7 kg and 30.6 +/- 2.7 kg/m². All subjects swallowed the capsule with correct x-ray control. The mean weight loss was 11.2 +/- 5.5 kg (12.1 +/- 5.8% of total weight loss [TWL], 64.7 +/- 25% of excess weight loss [EWL]), with a weight loss > 10% in 80% of patients (p < 0.05) after four months. Early elimination of the balloon with an insufficient duration (< 12 weeks) was observed in 2/24 patients (8.3%). There was an acceptable tolerance in 80%. With regard to adverse effects, one balloon was vomited up, there was one intolerance and the balloon was removed by gastroscopy and one small bowel ileal obstruction, which was removed by ileoscopy. The final satisfaction degree was good in 60% of cases. Conclusions: EIGB placement by x-ray seems feasible and safe. Although some devices have a shorter duration than expected, such as < 16 weeks in 29% patients and < 12 weeks in 8.3% of patients, an acceptable weight loss at four months was obtained. There were some adverse effects that required endoscopy, thus we advise that the procedure be supervised by a bariatric endoscopist

Feasibility, results and endoscopic requirements of the Elipse® swallowable intragastric balloon: initial experience.

BACKGROUND: the Elipse® intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a swallowable capsule that is filled under x-ray control. After 16 weeks, its self-releasing valve is degraded and the balloon is deflated and excreted naturally, without endoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of EIGB and its efficacy, duration, safety and endoscopic requirements. METHODS: this is a prospective, descriptive, non-randomized study of the first patients enrolled for EIGB. An x-ray was systematically performed after placement to ensure the correct filling of the balloon. The balloon duration was determined according to its excreted visualization or by x-ray/ultrasound. The efficacy, tolerance, adverse events and their resolution outcome (endoscopic requirements), as well as the final satisfaction degree at 16 weeks, were analyzed. RESULTS: the study included 30 patients with a basal mean weight and body mass index (BMI) of 83.3 ± 10.7 kg and 30.6 ± 2.7 kg/m². All subjects swallowed the capsule with correct x-ray control. The mean weight loss was 11.2 ± 5.5 kg (12.1 ± 5.8% of total weight loss [TWL], 64.7 ± 25% of excess weight loss [EWL]), with a weight loss > 10% in 80% of patients (p < 0.05) after four months. Early elimination of the balloon with an insufficient duration (< 12 weeks) was observed in 2/24 patients (8.3%). There was an acceptable tolerance in 80%. With regard to adverse effects, one balloon was vomited up, there was one intolerance and the balloon was removed by gastroscopy and one small bowel ileal obstruction, which was removed by ileoscopy. The final satisfaction degree was good in 60% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: EIGB placement by x-ray seems feasible and safe. Although some devices have a shorter duration than expected, such as < 16 weeks in 29% patients and < 12 weeks in 8.3% of patients, an acceptable weight loss at four months was obtained. There were some adverse effects that required endoscopy, thus we advise that the procedure be supervised by a bariatric endoscopist.

Endoscopia bariátrica y metabólica en el manejo del hígado graso. ¿Una nueva vía emergente? / Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy in the handling of fatty liver disease. A new emerging approach?

Introducción: la enfermedad hepática grasa no alcohólica (EHGNA) es la causa más frecuente de hepatopatía crónica en nuestro medio. Los beneficios de la endoscopia bariátrica en esta enfermedad están escasamente documentados. Objetivo: evaluar los cambios de EHGNA, mediante métodos no invasivos, en pacientes obesos sometidos a endoscopia bariátrica restrictiva. Secundariamente, analizamos los cambios ponderales y metabólicos y el grado de seguridad técnica. Métodos: treinta pacientes con EHGNA y obesidad (índice de masa corporal [IMC] medio de 38,22 +/- 6,55 kg/m²) sometidos a endoscopia bariátrica restrictiva: 15 balones de un año y 15 gastroplastias mediante suturas (ESG-Apollo(R)). Se realiza un análisis prospectivo no invasivo mediante parámetros analíticos (función hepática, insulinorresistencia, scores de esteatosis y fibrosis hepática) y ecográficos. Además, se evalúa la evolución antropométrica y de las principales comorbilidades mayores asociadas, todo ello con seguimiento a un año. Resultados: treinta pacientes (63% mujeres, edad media 46 +/- 13,8 años). A los 12 meses presentaron disminución en FLI, HSI, NAFLD-Fibrosis Score, esteatosis hepática ecográfica y grasa subcutánea (p < 0,001) y en HOMA-IR, insulina y triglicéridos (p < 0,05). Al año, se obtuvo una pérdida del exceso de peso (PEP) del 44,02% (16,34% pérdida total de peso [PTP]), con PEP > 25% en 27/30 pacientes (PP > 10% en 25/30 pacientes) (p < 0,001). Se objetivó resolución en 17/30 (57%) de las comorbilidades asociadas: 5/8 (62,5%) hipertensión arterial (HTA), 5/12 (41,7%) dislipemia (DLP), 2/4 (50%) diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2), 2/3 (66,7%) síndrome de apnea obstructiva del sueño (SAOS) y 3/3 (100%) artropatía. Comparando ambos procedimientos, la mejoría en HbA1c en el grupo de ESG-Apollo (p = 0,017) fue la única diferencia. Un balón migrado y expulsado espontáneamente fue la única incidencia técnica. Conclusiones: la endoscopia bariátrica puede postularse, en un seguimiento a corto plazo, como una alternativa eficaz y segura en aquellos pacientes obesos con EHGNA. Favorece la pérdida de peso y mejora los biomarcadores analíticos y ecográficos de grasa hepática, la insulinorresistencia, la hipertrigliceridemia y las comorbilidades mayores asociadas

Background: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most frequent cause of chronic hepatopathy in our environment. However, the benefits of the bariatric endoscopy in this disease are barely documented. Objectives: to evaluate changes in NAFLD, via non-invasive methods in obese patients who underwent bariatric restrictive endoscopy. Weight, metabolic changes and the level of technical safety were also analyzed as secondary objectives. Methods: thirty patients with NAFLD and obesity (mean BMI 38.22 +/- 6.55 kg/m2) underwent bariatric restrictive endoscopy; this included 15 one-year intragastric balloons and 15 sutured gastroplasties (ESG-Apollo(R)). A non-invasive prospective analysis was performed via analytical (hepatic function, insulin-resistance and hepatic steatosis/fibrosis scores) and ultrasonographic parameters. In addition, anthropometric features and the evolution of the main obesity-related comorbidities were evaluated. The follow-up period was one year in all cases. Results: thirty patients were included; 63% were female with a mean age of 46 +/- 13.8 years. There was a decrease in FLI, HSI, NAFLD-Fibrosis Score, hepatic ultrasonographic steatosis, subcutaneous fat (p < 0.001), HOMA-IR, insulin and triglycerides (p < 0.05) after 12 months. An average EWL of 44.02% (16.34% TBWL) was obtained after one year, with EWL > 25% in 27/30 patients (TBWL > 10% in 25/30 patients) (p < 0.001). Obesity-related comorbidities were resolved in 17/30 (57%) of cases, 5/8 (62.5%) HTA, 5/12 (41.7%) DLP, 2/4 (50%) T2DM, 2/3 (66.7%) SOAS and 3/3 (100%) arthropathy. An improvement in HbA1c in the ESG-Apollo group (p = 0.017) was the only difference. One migrated and spontaneously expelled balloon was the only technical incidence. Conclusions: bariatric endoscopy could be proposed during short-term follow-up as an effective and safe alternative in patients with obesity and NAFLD. It stimulates weight loss and improves analytical and ultrasound parameters from hepatic fat, insulin-resistance and hypertriglyceridemia. It also improves associated major comorbidities

Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy in the handling of fatty liver disease. A new emerging approach?

BACKGROUND: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most frequent cause of chronic hepatopathy in our environment. However, the benefits of the bariatric endoscopy in this disease are barely documented. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate changes in NAFLD, via non-invasive methods in obese patients who underwent bariatric restrictive endoscopy. Weight, metabolic changes and the level of technical safety were also analyzed as secondary objectives. METHODS: thirty patients with NAFLD and obesity (mean BMI 38.22 ± 6.55 kg/m2) underwent bariatric restrictive endoscopy; this included 15 one-year intragastric balloons and 15 sutured gastroplasties (ESG-Apollo®). A non-invasive prospective analysis was performed via analytical (hepatic function, insulin-resistance and hepatic steatosis/fibrosis scores) and ultrasonographic parameters. In addition, anthropometric features and the evolution of the main obesity-related comorbidities were evaluated. The follow-up period was one year in all cases. RESULTS: thirty patients were included; 63% were female with a mean age of 46 ± 13.8 years. There was a decrease in FLI, HSI, NAFLD-Fibrosis Score, hepatic ultrasonographic steatosis, subcutaneous fat (p < 0.001), HOMA-IR, insulin and triglycerides (p < 0.05) after 12 months. An average EWL of 44.02% (16.34% TBWL) was obtained after one year, with EWL > 25% in 27/30 patients (TBWL > 10% in 25/30 patients) (p < 0.001). Obesity-related comorbidities were resolved in 17/30 (57%) of cases, 5/8 (62.5%) HTA, 5/12 (41.7%) DLP, 2/4 (50%) T2DM, 2/3 (66.7%) SOAS and 3/3 (100%) arthropathy. An improvement in HbA1c in the ESG-Apollo group (p = 0.017) was the only difference. One migrated and spontaneously expelled balloon was the only technical incidence. CONCLUSIONS: bariatric endoscopy could be proposed during short-term follow-up as an effective and safe alternative in patients with obesity and NAFLD. It stimulates weight loss and improves analytical and ultrasound parameters from hepatic fat, insulin-resistance and hypertriglyceridemia. It also improves associated major comorbidities.

Documento español de consenso en endoscopia bariátrica. Parte 2. Tratamientos endoscópicos específicos / Spanish consensus document on bariatric endoscopy. Part 2: specific endoscopic treatments

Durante los últimos años estamos asistiendo a un importante incremento en el número y tipo de técnicas endoscópicas bariátricas: se han propuesto distintos modelos de balones, sistemas de suturas, inyección de sustancias, colocación de prótesis, etc. También se han incorporado técnicas endoscópicas de revisión para aquellos casos de pacientes intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica que presentan recuperación ponderal. Todo ello obliga a la necesidad de protocolizar, posicionar y regularizar todas estas técnicas, mediante un consenso que permita su aplicación clínica con el máximo rigor médico y evidencia científica disponibles. Tras editar una primera parte de Consideraciones Generales, en esta segunda revisaremos las indicaciones, metodología y resultados de cada una las principales técnicas que se realizan en nuestro país, con intención de establecer una base y unos requisitos mínimos que faciliten y favorezcan la correcta práctica diaria de estos procedimientos en las Unidades de Endoscopia Bariátrica

During the last years we have been witnessing a significant increase in the number and type of bariatric endoscopic techniques: we have different types of balloons, suture systems, injection of substances and malabsorptive prosthesis, etc. Also, some endoscopic revisional procedures for patients with weight regain after bariatric surgery have been incorporated. This makes it necessary to protocolize, position and regularize all these techniques, through a consensus that allows their clinical application with the maximum medical rigor and scientific evidence available

Spanish consensus document on bariatric endoscopy. Part 2: specific endoscopic treatments.

During the last years we have been witnessing a significant increase in the number and type of bariatric endoscopic techniques: we have different types of balloons, suture systems, injection of substances and malabsorptive prosthesis, etc. Also, some endoscopic revisional procedures for patients with weight regain after bariatric surgery have been incorporated. This makes it necessary to protocolize, position and regularize all these techniques, through a consensus that allows their clinical application with the maximum medical rigor and scientific evidence available.

Perforación gástrica por balón intragástrico en paciente con funduplicatura de Nissen. Respuesta del Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica / Gastric perforation by intragastric balloon in a patient with Nissen fundoplication. Response of the Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group

No disponible

Eficacia y seguridad del TORe mediante sutura endoscópica para tratar la reganancia ponderal tras bypass gástrico quirúrgico en Y-de-Roux / Efficacy and safety of transoral outlet reduction via endoscopic suturing in patients with weight regain after a surgical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Introducción: muchos de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía bariátrica (bypass gástrico en Y-de-Roux [RYGB]), con el tiempo, pueden recuperar parte del peso perdido. La reducción transoral del vaciamiento gástrico (TORe) con sutura endoscópica podría ser una alternativa válida en estos pacientes. Métodos: serie inicial retrospectiva que incluye a 13 pacientes consecutivos remitidos por reganancia ponderal tras RYGB y con anastomosis gastroyeyunal dilatada (> 15 mm). El TORe fue realizado mediante un dispositivo endoscópico de suturas transmurales (OverStitch-Apollo(R)), reduciendo el diámetro de la anastomosis y del reservorio gástrico. Se describen los datos iniciales de viabilidad técnica, seguridad y eficacia, con un seguimiento limitado a seis meses. Resultados: tras el RYGB, existía una pérdida media máxima de 37,69 kg y una posterior reganancia media de 21,62 kg. Se redujo el diámetro medio de la anastomosis de 36 mm (rango 20-45) a 9 mm (rango 5-12) (reducción del 75%) con una media de 2,5 suturas y el del reservorio de 7,2 cm (rango 2-10) a 4,7 cm (rango 4-5) (reducción del 34,72%) con una media de 2,7 suturas. La pérdida media de peso a los seis meses tras el TORe fue de 12,29 kg (pérdida del 56,85% del peso reganado tras RYGB). No se registraron complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento. Conclusiones: la reducción mediante sutura endoscópica de la anastomosis gastroyeyunal dilatada y del reservorio gástrico parece una opción viable y segura según nuestra limitada experiencia inicial. Dentro de un abordaje multidisciplinar y en un seguimiento a corto plazo, se presenta como una opción mínimamente invasiva y eficaz para controlar la reganancia ponderal tras RYGB

Introduction: many patients that undergo bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) may regain some of their weight lost over time. A transoral outlet reduction (TORe) with endoscopic suture could be a valid alternative in these patients. Methods: this was a retrospective initial series of 13 consecutive patients with weight regain after RYGB and a dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis (> 15 mm). TORe was performed using an endoscopic transmural suture device (OverStitch-Apollo(R)), which was used to reduce the anastomosis aperture and also to treat the gastric pouch. The initial data of feasibility, safety and weight loss are described with a limited follow-up of six months. Results: there was a mean maximum weight loss of 37.69 kg after RYGB and a subsequent average regain of 21.62 kg. The mean anastomosis diameter was 36 mm (range 20-45) which was reduced to 9 mm (range 5-12) (75% reduction), with an average of 2.5 sutures. The mean pouch size was 7.2 cm (range 2-10), which decreased to 4.7 cm (range 4-5) (34.72% reduction), with an average of 2.7 sutures. The mean weight loss six months after TORe was 12.29 kg, a weight loss of 56.85% of the weight regained after RYGB. No complications related to the procedure were recorded. Conclusions: endoscopic suture reduction of the dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis and the gastric pouch seems a feasible and safe option in our limited initial experience. With a multidisciplinary approach and a short term follow-up, this seems to be a minimally invasive and effective option to control weight regain after RYGB

Documento Español de Consenso en Endoscopia Bariátrica. Parte 1. Consideraciones generales / Spanish Consensus Document on Bariatric Endoscopy. Part 1. General considerations

La obesidad es una enfermedad crónica multifactorial, incurable, recurrente y progresiva, asociada a importantes complicaciones físicas y psicológicas y con considerable morbimortalidad. Por este motivo, deben individualizarse la evaluación, el tratamiento y el seguimiento del paciente obeso dentro de una unidad multidisciplinar que disponga de unos adecuados recursos humanos y estructurales. Su tratamiento médico mediante medidas higiénicas-dietéticas, aunque imprescindible, puede resultar insuficiente y la opción quirúrgica, reservada a obesidades severas o mórbidas, no está exenta de complicaciones ni es del agrado de muchos pacientes. En este contexto, pueden considerarse tres situaciones en las que el tratamiento endoscópico, como estrategia complementaria y con escasas complicaciones, contribuye al beneficio del paciente obeso: en primer lugar, aquel subgrupo de pacientes con sobrepeso grado II u obesidad no mórbida en el que el tratamiento médico aislado haya fracasado o como complemento al mismo; en segundo lugar, en aquellos pacientes con obesidad mórbida que rechacen la cirugía o a los cuales esta les resulte contraindicada o de riesgo excesivo; y finalmente, en aquellos pacientes afectos de superobesidad que necesitan perder peso previo a la cirugía bariátrica para disminuir la morbimortalidad de la misma. En este sentido, el Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica (Grupo Español de Trabajo para el Tratamiento Endoscópico del Metabolismo y la Obesidad [GETTEMO]) ha elaborado este Documento de Consenso para que sirva de orientación práctica a todos los profesionales implicados en la endoscopia de la obesidad y permita establecer los requisitos mínimos necesarios para el correcto funcionamiento de una Unidad de Endoscopia Bariátrica

La obesidad es una enfermedad crónica multifactorial, incurable, recurrente y progresiva, asociada a importantes complicaciones físicas y psicológicas y con considerable morbimortalidad. Por este motivo, deben individualizarse la evaluación, el tratamiento y el seguimiento del paciente obeso dentro de una unidad multidisciplinar que disponga de unos adecuados recursos humanos y estructurales. Su tratamiento médico mediante medidas higiénicas-dietéticas, aunque imprescindible, puede resultar insuficiente y la opción quirúrgica, reservada a obesidades severas o mórbidas, no está exenta de complicaciones ni es del agrado de muchos pacientes. En este contexto, pueden considerarse tres situaciones en las que el tratamiento endoscópico, como estrategia complementaria y con escasas complicaciones, contribuye al beneficio del paciente obeso: en primer lugar, aquel subgrupo de pacientes con sobrepeso grado II u obesidad no mórbida en el que el tratamiento médico aislado haya fracasado o como complemento al mismo; en segundo lugar, en aquellos pacientes con obesidad mórbida que rechacen la cirugía o a los cuales esta les resulte contraindicada o de riesgo excesivo; y finalmente, en aquellos pacientes afectos de superobesidad que necesitan perder peso previo a la cirugía bariátrica para disminuir la morbimortalidad de la misma. En este sentido, el Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica (Grupo Español de Trabajo para el Tratamiento Endoscópico del Metabolismo y la Obesidad [GETTEMO]) ha elaborado este Documento de Consenso para que sirva de orientación práctica a todos los profesionales implicados en la endoscopia de la obesidad y permita establecer los requisitos mínimos necesarios para el correcto funcionamiento de una Unidad de Endoscopia Bariátrica

Efficacy and safety of transoral outlet reduction via endoscopic suturing in patients with weight regain after a surgical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

INTRODUCTION: many patients that undergo bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) may regain some of their weight lost over time. A transoral outlet reduction (TORe) with endoscopic suture could be a valid alternative in these patients. METHODS: this was a retrospective initial series of 13 consecutive patients with weight regain after RYGB and a dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis (> 15 mm). TORe was performed using an endoscopic transmural suture device (OverStitch-Apollo®), which was used to reduce the anastomosis aperture and also to treat the gastric pouch. The initial data of feasibility, safety and weight loss are described with a limited follow-up of six months. RESULTS: there was a mean maximum weight loss of 37.69 kg after RYGB and a subsequent average regain of 21.62 kg. The mean anastomosis diameter was 36 mm (range 20-45) which was reduced to 9 mm (range 5-12) (75% reduction), with an average of 2.5 sutures. The mean pouch size was 7.2 cm (range 2-10), which decreased to 4.7 cm (range 4-5) (34.72% reduction), with an average of 2.7 sutures. The mean weight loss six months after TORe was 12.29 kg, a weight loss of 56.85% of the weight regained after RYGB. No complications related to the procedure were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: endoscopic suture reduction of the dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis and the gastric pouch seems a feasible and safe option in our limited initial experience. With a multidisciplinary approach and a short term follow-up, this seems to be a minimally invasive and effective option to control weight regain after RYGB.

Spanish Consensus Document on Bariatric Endoscopy. Part 1. General considerations.

Obesity is a chronic multifactorial, incurable, recurrent, and progressive disease associated with significant physical and psychological complications, and considerable morbidity and mortality. For this reason, the assessment, management, and follow-up of obese patients should take place in the setting of a multidisciplinary unit equipped with adequate human and structural resources. Medical treatment using hygienic-dietary measures, while indispensable, may be insufficient, and surgery, which is reserved for severe or morbid obesity, is not exempt from complications neither is to the liking of many patients. In this context three situations may be considered where endoscopic treatment, used as a supplementary strategy with few complications, contributes to benefit obese patients: first, in a subgroup of patients with grade-II overweight or non-morbid obesity where medical therapy alone failed or needs supplementation. Second, in patients with morbid obesity when surgery is rejected, is contraindicated, or entails excessive risk. Finally, in patients with superobesity who need to lose weight before bariatric surgery in order to reduce surgery-related morbidity and mortality. In this regard, the Spanish Task Force on Bariatric Endoscopy (Grupo Español de Trabajo para el Tratamiento Endoscópico del Metabolismo y la Obesidad, GETTEMO) have developed this Consensus Document to serve as practical guidance for all professionals involved in the endoscopic management of obesity, and to facilitate establishing a minimum set of requirements for the proper functioning of a bariatric endoscopy unit.

Nuevo balón intragástrico ingerible (Elipse(R)). ¿Café para todos? Posicionamiento de GETTEMO / A new swallowable intragastric balloon (Elipse(R)). Coffee for everybody? The position of GETTEMO

No disponible